Compare AI models: Qwen3.8 Max vs Grok 4.7
- Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba
- Grok 4.7xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 Max | 88/100 | 100/100 | 25/100 | 81/100 | 67/100 | 91/100 |
| Grok 4.7 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 71/100 | 25/100 | 75/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$6.00/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.25/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
119K
55K
Completed sessions
553,138
133,618
Token share
0.02%
0.01%
Tokens
256B+7%
70B+100%
SEP 2OCT 27
SEP 2OCT 27
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
43.5%5.4K user-weeks
42.9%1.6K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeQwen3.8 Max vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.8 Max·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGrok 4.7 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.7·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonQwen3.8 Max vs Jamba MiniQwen3.8 Max·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGrok 4.7 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.7·Jamba Mini