Compare AI models: MiniMax-M3 vs MiMo-V2.5
- MiniMax-M3MiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniMax-M3 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 83/100 | 42/100 | 92/100 | 50/100 | 21/100 |
| MiMo-V2.5 | 17/100 | 53/100 | 77/100 | 92/100 | 67/100 | 50/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.60/ 1M
$0.14/ 1M
Output
$2.40/ 1M
$0.28/ 1M
Cached input
$0.12/ 1M
$0.003/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
198K
1M
Completed sessions
1,661,829
42,008,806
Token share
0.18%
2.4%
Tokens
2.1T-56%
29T-23%
SEP 2OCT 27
SEP 2OCT 27
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
60.2%12K user-weeks
66.9%18K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M3 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M3·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeMiMo-V2.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiMo-V2.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3 vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMiMo-V2.5 vs Jamba MiniMiMo-V2.5·Jamba Mini