Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813DeepSeek
- MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 | 77/100 | 100/100 | 40/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 |
| MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 68/100 | 81/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.79/ 1M
$0.15/ 1M
Output
$2.38/ 1M
$0.60/ 1M
Cached input
$0.03/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
26
933K
Completed sessions
422
125,548,147
Token share
0%
15.8%
Tokens
72M+100%
188T+100%
SEP 2OCT 27
SEP 2OCT 27
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
75.4%11K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M3.1-Flash·Jamba Mini