Compare AI models: Qwen3.7 Max vs MiniMax-M2.5
- Qwen3.7 MaxAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- MiniMax-M2.5MiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.7 Max | 59/100 | 91/100 | 21/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| MiniMax-M2.5 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 51/100 | 55/100 | 50/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
205K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.50/ 1M
$0.30/ 1M
Output
$7.50/ 1M
$1.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.50/ 1M
$0.03/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
37K
27K
Completed sessions
86,444
84,859
Token share
0%
0%
Tokens
26B-91%
13B-57%
SEP 2OCT 27
SEP 2OCT 27
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
46.6%986 user-weeks
63.1%179 user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeQwen3.7 Max vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.7 Max·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeMiniMax-M2.5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M2.5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonQwen3.7 Max vs Jamba MiniQwen3.7 Max·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMiniMax-M2.5 vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M2.5·Jamba Mini